You are correct - the tag is a red flag. There are SOME instances where the top line is hidden with legit Wild Oats tags, but the size thing is the clincher on it being fake. Avoid, it's a Thai counterfeit.

Good question, I have never seen a sewn in Gem tag. GEM did churn out Cranberries tees - so that makes sense. I would make sure that the measurements match an XL GEM shirt, seems to be in the 23" range. The tag doesn't match the common fake, but it's not a great photo of it and there is a new f...

Hard to say from here but the cracking along the outside border is very screen print-esque.

Beauty. This is a tough one to figure out between bootlegs and OGs, as there's a TON of variance with this print. But yeah, as you pointed out, no copyright which seems to be always on OGs. It's definitely 70s and luckily, it looks like a screen print. A ton of these were heat transfers, even one th...

He says a bootleg of some sort, might get $100 to $200

Hi there! I'm stumped! I can't find one like it. Is there a tag along the neck? It's odd that it's double-stitched, as that's a more modern trend.

There were a lot of bootlegs.

I'll ask my buddy who knows these tees well.

It's probably getting close....maybe 2000s made? It's a mullet, so kinda feel like in the case of HD tees, that doesn't help, value-wise.

Might get $25-50 for it?

This is an oddball one. I know I've seen something similar, like this one: stones.jpg Mabe yours looks to be a boot. I don't think it impacts the value much, maybe it's on the scarcer side. But Voodoo RS t-shirts are in heavy supply, you'd prob. get $50 to $100...unless there happens to be some coll...

Yeah man I agree.

I think it may have always been a bootleg? I'm having a hard time wrapping my head around a movie company in the 90s putting out a shirt with that on it.

I can't find any record of them on WorthPoint, maybe they don't index it because of the back.

I reviewed the print more carefully - it's a screen print, so we know that. I compared it for fine details against two others I was able to find, and the fine details I zeroed in on are all there. The tag isn't in our archive of fake Gildans. The font on the back, the spacing, all seem to be ok. But...