it might not be official or confirmed history, but i think we’re on the right track.

everything about the shirt looks correct, only thing that’s odd is the tag, but that doesn’t necessarily mean it’s fake. could just be a gildan variant that is not very common with the shirt. maybe the last ...

sorry i forgot to answer this but no, the shirt has no licensing or year whatsoever. but neither do the other ones, regardless of tag or variations.

exactly on point. i do agree though, if it were to be faked i would expect a more popoluar size , even a fake FOTL tag to go with it. i’ve seen some fakes but the prints are always off , whether its size or the ink/ printing itself (you can tell it’s a modern printing).

pit to pit is 20”

from ...

so all in all, what’s the final verdict? it is very odd, definitely not a shirt you see all the time. especially with that tag! any input or professional opinion on it? i’d really appreciate it! please and thank you

Info on this shirt is scarce, from what i’ve been able to pick up and gather, so i really appreciate you guys helping me out!

my guess is that the shirt was printed on a later date from the originals. so although it’s not fake, it’s also not from the original printings either. but again that’s my ...

It was being sold on grailed! by a reputable seller from what it seems. he’s sold some over the years, one actually with a gildan heavy cotton tag. 3 years ago i believe? i’m not sure if i can post links or not in the forum but if you’d like to see the listing i can reply with it attached!

everything checks out imo, i just haven’t seen the shirt printed on that gildan . the tag does match the time when this shirt was released but thoughts??