Defunkd

[vytautas]

Hey guys, I’m stumped on this one.
I found this Pink Floyd bootleg shirt, but there are a lot of red flags with it.

Firstly, the print is off-center, off-color, and not consistent with other examples I’ve found. Secondly, it’s missing the KSN licensing print. I know bootlegs aren’t always consistent, but this one just too off.

The neck label is faded, but you can still make out some details - the orb and the “M” sizing are in the same place as a KSN-licensed example I found. Overall, both neck labels look the same in size and placement. It’s single stitch, so the age checks out, but the shirt itself feels quite flimsy.

Can anybody share some insight? Is it maybe a reprint of a bootleg on the same blank?
Seems far-fetched, but I’m lost on this shirt.

Looking for advice, insight, or just a discussion - anything helps. Thanks, guys!

[camis_wapas]

I’d say it’s an original 90s bootleg!

[jimmyj]

I think given the obscure tags clearly match, yours showing more fade - that it's the same print, for one reason or another copyright/licensing info can be left off subsequent, or even the original version of the print.

Also, I don't see any major red flags between the two prints, the only difference appears to be the lack of that KSN graphic - all the other details track.

Do you notice any major discrepancies between the two prints?

[vytautas]

To be honest, it’s just the lack of sharpness and the crooked print, but both are acceptable issues.

Nice - glad you fellas agree that it’s good. Such a sick graphic.

I’ve seen the same ones go for around $200–$300. Would it be smart to price it in that range?

[jimmyj]

Looks like it might be small? the width looks slim. Size will impact the value, what's the pit to pit?

[vytautas]

It's between an M/L.
Pit to pit - 52cm
Whole length - 72cm

[jimmyj]

Yeah not bad but probably a modern M. Probably in the $100-200 range?