Defunkd

[brdsinatlana]

This is from a highly rated ebay seller who claims the tee was purchased from someone who worked for a distribution company back in the day, and got the tee firsthand--but never wore it. After getting hands on it I have doubts about the authenticity.

The print is a bit tacky/sticky to the touch (it makes a sound when you pull your finger away from it), and it doesn't crack at all when you pull at it.

The tag feels crisp, is very white, and the print color looks a bit lighter than the legit reference on this site (that last part could entirely be due to lighting, though).

Both shoulders are bunched up like this, which seems like the kind of poor quality you wouldn't expect from late 90s USA-made shirts. But by 98 this could just be a mass produced blank.

Any ideas? The seller does accept returns, but I hate the idea of paying return shipping for something based on an inaccurate description...

[jimmyj]

This is from a highly rated ebay seller who claims the tee was purchased from someone who worked for a distribution company back in the day, and got the tee firsthand--but never wore it. After getting hands on it I have doubts about the authenticity.

1.jpg
2.jpg
3.jpg
4.jpg
5.jpg
6.jpg
The print is a bit tacky/sticky to the touch (it makes a sound when you pull your finger away from it), and it doesn't crack at all when you pull at it.

7.jpg
The tag feels crisp, is very white, and the print color looks a bit lighter than the legit reference on this site (that last part could entirely be due to lighting, though).

8.jpeg
9.jpeg
Both shoulders are bunched up like this, which seems like the kind of poor quality you wouldn't expect from late 90s USA-made shirts. But by 98 this could just be a mass produced blank.

Any ideas? The seller does accept returns, but I hate the idea of paying return shipping for something based on an inaccurate description...

I don't see anything suspicious here - but can you do one high quality shot of just the print?