I think this is okay? I mean it's not a great shot of the print, and the tag is worn, but the print looks decent from afar.

she's in! cheers

These aren't great photos, what size is being covered?

It's okay it's a sign from the universe to wait for the right one

It is not Legit, so avoid! Can tell by the tag.

Listed under Giant Generic:

https://www.defunkd.com/fake-tag-archive/#giant-1

hey all posts help, I don't think we've got the Jimi one! You have it? You gonna load new batteries in?

So here's a little grid for comparison. The OG version is provided by Bullethole vintage on IG. The reissue is the Bill Graham licensed one, not staff. But added that in just for a fourth version - and one that someone printed years later (like a counterfeiter would do - and even a professional who ...

If legit, prob $100.

That's a 2000s+ tag. Just kept the OG copyright date.

P&C was launched in 1998. So the chances of this being vintage are slim, but I have never done a dive into these tags because they are most of the 2000s.

yeah yer okay here!

I'm waiting to hear back from the gent who I know has an original, and I'll do side by sides in an image tomorrow. BUT even if it checks out - the fact that it's missing the backprint - and a tag will always have people questioning it. It might be better to hold out for one with zero red flags, ya ...

I have seen and held it 1 year ago, previously the tag was hanes exactly the same as this picture maybe this is the shirt and the tag has been cut off. I think this shirt is made of vintage material with new print screen printing and I am not sure this shirt is original I'll reach out to a gent I ...

maybbbbbbe vintage bootleg - but I can't find another one using Google lens, can you?

What is their reasoning as to why it's fake? I never looked into it beyond value.

I'm leaning toward this being legit, but lacking the back print. Now, that will pose problems, people will be suspicious - as will the missing tag. But the print does not match the reissues - it's accurate based on comparing it to a known original. Even the STAFF text is perfect. I saw it on eBay ...

I think I found it on Carousell - was it seller in Indonesia?

The other one I found has a Hanes tag - looks like that could be remnants of that in your collar. But yes, also a backprint with staff. Does yours have double stitch bottom hem? I can't tell from the photo. It's definitely not the reissue. If it checks out - it's a print error, just forgot to do the ...

This is a frat house promo tee, so not official Bob Marley, and likely may not be attractive to someone looking for a Marley tee, so gonna say $20-30 perhaps? Unless you find a Theta Chi alumn to buy it.

The tag looks okay, but it's of the 1999 and beyond era. So if you're looking for an OG, this isn't it:

https://www.defunkd.com/blog/2010/07/29/anvil/

But just to be sure make sure the pit to pit is within the range of a 2000s M.

That's some Frankenstein level of stuff right there. Why would a tee from 2005, at the earliest, have a Giant by Tee Jays tag? an L with a 26" that's a modern 2-3XL

$20? I dunno.

It seems to be in the upper part of the range, if you comb through these and click Authentication Data the pit to pit for a L seems to range from 20-22". https://www.defunkd.com/brand/fruit-of-the-loom-best/ But remember, seller's can report falsely on that - and even manipulate the fabric when ...

This is a new generation fake on a fake Giant by Tultex tag

I'm seeing a DS bottom on the next-gen of Screen Stars Best tags. After a quick search, for your tag design, didn't find an example. Sometimes, there's some crossover, but looking at the quality of the print, it seems low in that one photo. What's the pit to pit? Can you do a closeup with just the ...

Using this data, the chest size is in the range. https://www.defunkd.com/brand/all-sport-proweight/ But you'll also notice if you go through that and our other All Sport tags, I couldn't spot any double stitch collars. Now, it was only about 30 tees I looked at and not everyone had a view of the ...