From what I can gather, these tags are recent, I've never even seen one before. Sorry, modern tee, no value.

The Pakistan-based tag usually indicates a bootleg, so he likely bought it outside the venue. Those tees were not the best quality, some of them quite thin. The size, well, they Ms from the 70s mostly don't even qualify as an S in the modern era. But still a great piece to a LZ/70s rock collector ...

I believe this is okay, would prefer to check the print vs a known original - photos aren't great. Also feel weird talking about a shirt with M&O Knits tags, lol. I need to find out the exact date those tags came to be still.

Nothing to worry about there. P was probably printed first and a slight ink or registration mishap. could even be a smudge. sometimes there's also underlay inks, you can flip it inside out to see

yeah don't worry about that likely a thread mishap - I'm not sure what you mean on the P - there's a green outline?

she's in!

Thank you. This looks okay to me - look at that beauty close up - also found another one with DS on the bottom. What did you mean the E is crooked?

There are legit reasons for sewn in tags, the 23" chest might be a little wide for a vintage XL - but the shirt is also worn like crazy and could have been stretched. I'll ask someone else to chime in to see if this print is being circulated.

The tag is real, I can't really make out the other details, but you say the collar is double stitched?

Can you just take a photo, level, of the front of the shirt? high quality.

What's the pit to pit?

I don't even know what a legit GD tee even is lol, but is it vintage? Not sure - seems like more of a 2000s thing. Also, many details lost in the print when compared to others floating around - but it's also tie dyed, so that doesn't help. I can't find another one like it - especially the back print ...

Good Q, first I'm seeing it. When I dig in the company says it's been around since the 1980s. Seems like there are some blanks floating around too. Not sure what to say on this one. I also see the same tag in a 4XL - which seems unlikely for 80s or 90s.

I don't see any issues here! Meausurements suggest he may never have washed it perhaps

Looks to me like a 2000s tee, not 1990s, but it's not a modern boot. I reached out to another gent to chime in.

Have yet to see a fake tag like that Giant version - but is it sewn in (fraudulently)? The photos of the print aren't great can you please do a closeup of just the front print?

In good shape, these can go in the $200 range.

Sorry, I don't even know where to start with this one - can't find a comp - anyone else?

I found a few shortsleeve versions that sold in the $75 range a few years ago. I'd price it at $300 with offers.

Ha, I can't find a grey version. But also not sure this is one that would be faked. The tag seems okay do the measurements match a Tultex L?

ilikeshirts420 wrote: ↑Tue Apr 29, 2025 10:14 pm what would authenic ones look like

Check here under Giant Generic:

https://www.defunkd.com/fake-tag-archive/#giant-1

Yeah that does not match a true vintage XL.

Seem to be fairly common - there's an M on eBay now for $65

Doesn't look good to me, what's the print?

Sorry, it is not legit. Tag is the first redflag, it's counterfeit. But what is the pit to pit?

What was their concern, authenticity-wise?

Rock@Tees are modern bootlegs, from the 2000s era, not exactly sure the full history.

viewtopic.php?f=8&t=6992&start=0

Our work is done here.